Can anyone running a linux and win32 box try to run this example and see if it completely drains you of CPU. I have tried it with 3 macs and I can't seem to do much more in PD. Also does anyone know of a less cpu intensive way to track objects in PD using a mac like pix_multiblob does. I would like to track at least 20 objects. My project is dead unless I figure out a better way. Thanks, Alain > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/05/11 Fri PM 03:24:20 EDT > To: <pd-list@iem.at> > Subject: [PD] pix_multiblob cpu usage > > I made a 400x300 motion JPEG-a movie 15 fps with 5 solid blue circles moving > on a black background > to test pix_mutiblob. I open it up with pix_film, flip it with pix_flip and > send it to pix_multiblob. I suddenly > notices PD getting very, very slow. When I look at the cpu usage in activity > monitor (if you can believe > activity monitor) I get 100-104% cpu usage. I cant do anything else in PD > because PD gets so slow. I > am using a dual 2Ghz G5 with ATI Radeon 9800 XT and 3GB of internal memory. > Is this normal? What > can I do to lower cpu usage? What else can I use within Gem to get the same > results? I eventually want > to be able to track 20-30 objects but It looks like it would be imposible at > this rate. > Thanks, > Alain > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
