Could that be called a ProphePd? ~Kyle
On 5/26/07, nick weldin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe someone could make a pd patch to dynamically calculate this so > that we can be sure to be ready for the arrival of ver1.0 ;) > > >Taking into account that Pd was started around 1996, assuming a > >version number of 0.00 then, it now has reached 0.41 in 2007 and thus > >will reach 1.0 in 2022. > > > >A different calculation is less optimistic: As the current speed of > >version numbers is about 0.01 per annum, it will take another 59 years > >to reach 1.0, which is 2066. > > > >Or Pd may do as Ardour did: Just jump from 0.9999... to 2.0 and leave > >out 1.0 entirely. > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- ----- ------------ ---- ----- ---- -------- - ------ http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list