Just curious, why wouldn't there ever be a 64-bit version of GEM?
I've been thinking that a 64-bit build of Pd-extended would be nice
to have, especially because using 64-bit floats as Pd's native format
would make it much more flexible. You could represent UNIX
timestamps properly, for example.
.hc
On Aug 3, 2007, at 1:19 PM, chris clepper wrote:
I have at least 4 MacPros running GEM here right now. Assuming you
want to run OSX there aren't that many problems related to the
Intel chips beyond the general decrease in performance over the
previous G5/PPC 970.
There is no 64bit version of GEM for OSX and there never will be one.
On 8/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi
i just received a new g5 and wanted to get tips and pointers and
caveats regarding pd on this machine, ideally it will run pd,Gem
and pdp/pidip etc..
links, frozen warnings etc... anticipated
pp
Patrick Pagano
Sound and Light Technologist
School of Theatre and Dance
University of Florida
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Mistrust authority - promote decentralization. - the hacker ethic
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
