Ok, I understand. Then what should I call it? "freesend" or "destroysend" or "destructorsend" or "free_send" or "destroy_send" or "destructor_send"
"On top of this, it gets triggered in the middle of deleting a patch, which means you can't rely on the patch being complete and you can't rely on the patch being empty either. " This is not an issue with this external as it is made to annonce to another patch that the current patch is being deleted. On 9/3/07, Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Thomas O Fredericks wrote: > > > Since I started making externals for PD, here is a new one: [closemsg X] > > It sends a bang to X when it is destroyed. It therefore acts as a > > closebang. See attached source and i386 linux binary. > > It shouldn't be called "close" because [closebang] is made to be banged > just before deleting objects in the patch, just like [initbang] and > [loadbang] are made to be banged after actual creation. [closemsg] gets > triggered too late for that. On top of this, it gets triggered in the > middle of deleting a patch, which means you can't rely on the patch being > complete and you can't rely on the patch being empty either. > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... > | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada -- thomas ouellet fredericks, [EMAIL PROTECTED], montreal, canada
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
