On 9/9/07, Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > > On 9/8/07, *Ken Restivo* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:48:52PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > > > Hi. I acquired a p5 glove, and the Pd interface I found for it > > relies on > > > OSCx. I've been trying to build it, having added -fPIC to it, > > but I get > > > this: > > > make[1]: Entering directory > > `/home/chuckk/Glove/pd/externals/OSCx/src' > > > cc -Wl,-export_dynamic -shared -o sendOSC.pd_linux sendOSC.o > > htmsocket.o > > > OSC-system-dependent.o -L../../../pd/bin -lpd -lc -lm > > ../libOSC/libOSC.a > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpd > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > make[1]: *** [sendOSC.pd_linux] Error 1 > > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > `/home/chuckk/Glove/pd/externals/OSCx/src' > > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > > > > > > > I added several paths to the INCLUDES line in src/Makefile, as > > the guy > > > suggested, with the path to a Pd src folder, but still it can't > > find this > > > -lpd. I read man ld and tried searching for any kind of > > *libpd*, * pd.a*, or > > > *pd.so* on my entire hard drive, and none of them exist. Should > > I replace > > > this -lpd with something else? I tried removing it, and it > > built a faulty > > > set of OSCx objects that don't work. > > > > > > > The linker uses -L not -I to determine its paths. > > > > Try -L/usr/wherever/pd/libs/are/located ? > > > > > > Hi Ken, thanks for the suggestion. It doesn't seem to make a > > difference. There are a series of -L flags and a series of -I flags, > > so I'm guessing whoever wrote it knew the difference. But I tried both. > > I also tried removing the -lpd flag, since, again, there is no file on > > my system that would satisfy it, and it built dumpOSC.pd_linux, > > sendOSC.pd_linux, and OSCroute.pd_linux, but Pd cannot create a > > dumpOSC object, while it does create the other two... > > So it _can_ build sendOSC.pd_linux when you remove the -lpd flag? That > makes sense because there is no need for the pd library if you're > building a dynamic shared library. > The dumpOSC problem may relate to it's use of type-punning that assumes > 32 bit floats and ints. I changed unpackOSC to use an int/float union > instead. > See > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1788587&group_id=55736&atid=478070
Actually, it built okay; I was just trying to add a dumpOSC object with no argument. With an argument it works... -Chuckk
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list