I think there is a strong momentum coming out of history that technical things are for men. if you do not steer against that momentum a little bit, then the system will stay in that state of unbalanced injustice. relying on osmosis, you will have to wait for some generations to get a change, which is quite cynical... marius.
Yves Degoyon wrote: > '[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> hi >>> This email makes me realize that pd/pd-list is mostly used by male >>> users/subscribers... damn. >>> >> Please, do have in mind that the reason many don't have access to >> sophisticated tools like Pd is because there are not sufficient means of >> mediation/translation/teaching/learning not because of gender speculations >> > i'm not sure what the subject of this thread is, > if there's not so many women in pd because > the documentation is not clear enough? > isn's that valid for men too? > and should there be a special documentation > aimed at girls? > and also special events and labs for women only? > > separating the two is just loosing all the osmosis > and it's really sad to see.. > > anyway, feel free to contribute and propose > your own documentation. > > ciao, > sevy > >> __________ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
