I'm a bit torn on this. I actually like the concept, but you're right, like all good things that make life easy they tend to erode discipline and structure. The patch messy and sweep it all under the rug philosophy is probably very appealing to many.
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:27:47 -0400 "Kevin McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Pd graph-on-parent makes more sense IMHO because it uses existing Pd > > mechanisms for encapsulation and encourages patchers to modularize their > > programs. > > > > 100% agreed, that is why I thought "umm... what's so special about this > presentation mode?" when I saw that page. To me that should be planned into > the program. If your patches are messy for performance, code cleaner, use > subpatches, etc, no excuses for that as far as I see. Sends and receives > for gui objects have been there since I started.. I guess I wasn't really > excited about any of that stuff :) but then again maybe I misunderstand.. > > km > -- Use the source _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
