Hi, Frank Barknecht a écrit : > Hallo, > Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> i think, there is a consent in the pd-community, that [namecanvas] >> shouldn't be considered to be deprecated. you'll find a lot of post in >> the archive about this. i believe, it is just a matter of miller >> removing that sentence from the help-file.
First I sorry to bring back this discussion to the list, that might not appear anymore if a definitive solution is found, and applied. > I think, one of the problems of [namecanvas] is that it's an object, > and thus it can be deleted by a message. One suggested way out was to > instead make namecanvas an actual property of the canvas, that is set > through the props menu. > > Ciao Oh yes, that clearly shows the problem involved by this object, if it's deleted, I suppose (but didn't test) that the graph would take back it's original name and then messages sent through [namecanvas] argument sender won't come anymore to the targeted graph. The proposed solution seems very good and AFAIU it would appear like in this canvas pattern: #X coords 0 1 99 -1 200 140 1 /$0-name-of-the-graph; Unfortunately I've no clue how to do it myself yet, and hope this is not "talk for nothing". _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list