Drat, we need some way to list the available fonts by the appropriate names so that Tk will find them. I don't know a simple way to do that at the moment!
M On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:10:24PM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote: > I guess that is not correct, since it changes to the same font no matter > what I put there. I do have Bitstream Vera Sans Mono installed. > > On 10/23/07, Luke Iannini (pd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You're right. It looks like it's using regular Bitstream Vera Sans rather > > than Mono?I have this line in my .pdrc > > -font-face "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono" > > Is that correct? > > > > > > Also, Pd-Extended defaults to Monaco on OS X, which is included, but I > > don't like it since it is not anti-aliased (I posted about that elsewhere). > > > > > > On 10/23/07, Miller Puckette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The following lines: > > > > > > sys_fontlist[i].fi_hostfontsize = > > > atom_getintarg(3 * best + 2, argc, argv); > > > sys_fontlist[i].fi_width = atom_getintarg(3 * best + 3, argc, > > > argv); > > > sys_fontlist[i].fi_height = atom_getintarg(3 * best + 4, argc, > > > argv); > > > > > > are how Pd finds out the actual font size from teh Tk front end; in Pd > > > extended the font patch comments these lines out, so Pd assumes the font > > > size is exactly as specified. This leads to problems like clicking on > > > one > > > place and getting text selected in another. I never understood why the > > > lines were commented out. > > > > > > I'm not sure how wise it is to make a relase of Pd that depends on > > > having > > > a particular font installed... looks like this breaks a lot of machines. > > > > > > > > > cheers > > > Miller > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:01:16PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > > > > > > Yup, you don't have Bitstream Vera Sans Mono working/installed. It > > > > has a distinctive lower L. > > > > > > > > .hc > > > > > > > > On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote: > > > > > > > > >Here's a new pic demonstrating the issue, by the way (I'll add it > > > > >to the tracker) > > > > >The 1px wide canvas is demonstrating where I am clicking, and the > > > > >actual cursor is visible to show the result. > > > > > > > > > >On 10/23/07, Luke Iannini (pd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > >>Sounds good to me! I think my biggest "blocker"-level issues with > > > > >>the extended 0.40.3 builds are the mismatched font-cursor handling > > > > >>in object-boxes with the new fonts, and the inability to use >~/ > > > > >>mtx_*~ and so on (though I believe IOhannes may have fixed that > > > > >>recently?). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >What mismatched font cursor handling? If there's a bug, please > > > > >report it on the tracker. :-) > > > > > > > > > >I did, and apparently it was fixed : ). Anyway, the description is > > > > >exactly the same: > > > > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker /index.php? > > > > >func=detail&aid=1650752&group_id=55736&atid=478070 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Can this be reopened or should I submit a new one? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Cheers > > > > >Luke > > > > > > > > > ><Picture 1.png> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ ------------------------------ > > > ------------ > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > kill your television > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info > > > /listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > PD-dev mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list