Patrice Colet a écrit : > Mathieu Bouchard a écrit : >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Ypatios Grigoriadis wrote: >> >>> If i may now borrow the theory and terminus Arrow of time by Arthur >>> Eddington, according to which time is the fourth dimension in space, >> >> Afaik, Arthur Eddington made the first English translation of >> Einstein. This is probably what got him in that 4th dimension thing, >> or perhaps it was the other way around (that he had thought of a 4th >> dimension concept and sought in Einstein's work a confirmation of it). >> I don't really know. >> >> Anyway: in some way, the past is equally hard to "postdict" as the >> future is hard to predict, but it depends on what one looks for. We >> are used to think of the past using what remains from it, but almost >> every event of the past is virtually unreachable due to having been >> blurred beyond repair. For any set of things you observe, everything >> else is left unobserved. The attention span of observers is tiny >> compared to what could become relevant to the observers later. > > I'm very happy to read anything else than space-time gibbering, thanks. gibbering = drivel, sorry for bad translation.
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list