On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > afaik, [readsf~] is 'stupid' and will always read in the environment's > > sampling rate. in order to read faster, put [readsf~] in a subpatch > > together with a [block~ 1 1 64], so that it reads 64 times quicker than > > at standard sampling rate. > > i suggest to use a block-size larger than "1" to get a decent caching > and not spend so much time doing meta-work instead of moving data. > > [block~ 1024 1 64]
oops, yes.. i actually wanted to write [block~ 64 1 64], but yeah, using a blocksize of 1024 is even better. roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list