On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:56:19PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. >> they needs fixing globaly. >> who is responsible for the CVS ? > > nobody. > the authors are responsible for their stuff. > so: if zexy/src/Makefile is broken, it is my fault... > >> i think that all of them have to be generalised ,so we can easiely build >> anything. >> i do everything manually on my system, >> cause quite a few makefiles try to use -m32 in CFLAGS and many of them >> need -fPIC to be added. > > at least the pd-sources (+externs) have fixed this by now. > i think the (erroneous) use of the "-m32" flag in pd-0.40 convinced several > developers to add this flag to their makefiles. i kidda realise thatr as well . > >> there basic externals , which don't have any ./configure part, i think >> we need to work on those first , leaving Gem and DataFlow aside .. > > GridFlow you mean? ah , sure yeah :) > >> also there is acouple of external which have duplicated objects. > > what do you mean here? > nameclashes? duplicated functionality? aliases? yeah ..i can't remenber, but when i used my strategy: #' foreach pde (`find -iname '*.pd_linux'`) ln -s $pde /opt/audio/lib/pd/ext/cvs-all/ end #' i found some file with the same names .., and they seemd to copy some stuff from on external directory into anothr in order to resolvetheir little dependency , i suppose ..
such things should be included in some guidelines may be, if we wish to have any guide lines as such . > > > > fmga.sdr > IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list