Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>> .pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals.
>>
> 
> Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension.  It  
> works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries.

but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from my 
side; there is nothing wrong with that)

once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will support 
the .d_fat idiom too.
in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have 
different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why 
should we?)


gmadsr
IOhannes

_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to