Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> >> .pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals. >> > > Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension. It > works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries.
but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from my side; there is nothing wrong with that) once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will support the .d_fat idiom too. in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why should we?) gmadsr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list