On 5 Dec 2007, at 12:28 PM, Chris McCormick wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 12:18:51AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 18:19 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: >>> Hallo, >>> Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote: >>> >>>> I think it's a real question whether it's better to have Pd act >>>> similarly >>>> across all platforms or whether it's best to adapt key bindings, >>>> etc., to >>>> specific ones. Certainly the first solution makes long-term >>>> maintainabilty >>>> (a high priority for me) easier. >>> >>> I'm for sensible Pd-specific default shortcuts plus - in the longer >>> term - user-configurable shortcuts. Imagine if Emacs or Vi would >>> follow MS-Windows-guidelines ... >> >> my vote goes clearly for same behaviour of pd over all platforms. > > Same here, but with a configuration option for 'use platform > keybindings' > for people who want that.
in OSX most of the OS 'standard' bindings use apple-, so one way to look at it for that platform is keep the cntrl- bindings exactly as they are cross platform, and then make the apple- bindings more OSX- like. At present I understand that the apple- binding are actually exactly the same as the cntrl- ones, probably due to the way it has been implemented. simon _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
