That's still 5 mins to burn through on an "average machine" or quarter of an hour on a low spec.
Knock a couple of zeros off. On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:17:46 +0100 Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, > Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote: > > > Until is the only conditional in Pd we have (unless you construct your own > > messages with feedback arrangement) that gives a deferred conditional after > > executing at least once, just like DO-WHILE or REPEAT-UNTIL. If you > > constrain > > it with numbers then it's logically a FOR(range) construct. > > If people want to make sure to not be bitten by the endless loop, they > could just use > > [inlet] > | > [b] > | > [f 1000000000000] > | [inlet] > | | > [until] > | > [outlet] > > as an abstraction called: [funtil] It will bang 1000000000000 times > unless stopped, which is more bangs for the bang than most people > would want. > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Use the source _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list