I'm still thinking about it. On the plus side, it would make Pd users' lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence and thus reduce Pd's portability.
The OSC design is not much better than that of MIDI, in my opinion... it's a pity it's so widely adopted. cheers Miller On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:20:43PM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote: > Ahaha I KNEW it! > > Well, did Miller ever weigh in on this? > > ~Kyle > > On Jan 5, 2008 9:30 AM, Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:23 PM, Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > > > > There will be no direct support for OSC in [sssad] unless Miller > > > > > decides to include some OSCroute-variant in plain Pd, as sssad will > > > > > never require externals. > > > > > > > > Has anyone lobbied Miller for this feature? > > > > <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/033012.html> but > > > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:08:24AM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote: > > > Wait, isn't OSC GNU? Deja vu for some reason... > > > > Read the thread. > > > > > > Best, > > > > Chris. > > > > > > ------------------- > > http://mccormick.cx > > > > > > -- > ----- > ------------ > ---- ----- > ---- -------- - ------ > http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com > http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list