On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 08:25 -0800, Miller Puckette wrote: > Hmm. It never occured to me that people would want to put declare objects > inside abstractions (I think it's unwise to do so because there's no way > to contain the declare object's effects to within the abstraction.) > > That it's adding stuff to the parent patch is a serious bug; there's no > reason to believe that putting declare in abstractions is doing a useful > thing at all at present!
please don't feel offended, but did you seriously test [declare] within abstractions? i did test [declare -stdpath] in pd-0.40.3 (see my mail in pd-dev [1]) and it works as at least i would expect it: it adds the path to the abstractions search pathes only, but not to the parent patch. if this is _not_ the expected behaviour, then lets define some [declare] test environment for all different flags in order to avoid declare confusions in the future. [1] http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-01/010643.html roman ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
