I agree as well, prefer the existing vline message syntax. (I hope we haven't started a movement against the third value!) Now that I get it, it is much more intuitive than emulating an old 2 value breakpoint envelope.
Has anyone made a vline-like external that only takes the first two values? Cheers, ~Brandon On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >> Note that the former version is *muchmuch* more convenient, >> especially >> when building line segments dynamically. > > totally! > i just wanted to demonstrate that there is indeed no mandatory > reason to > have the 3rd value - but not because of the shortcuts kyle mentioned > (which seem to do more harm than good) > > fgmadsr. > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
