I agree as well, prefer the existing vline message syntax.  (I hope we  
haven't started a movement against the third value!)  Now that I get  
it, it is much more intuitive than emulating an old 2 value breakpoint  
envelope.

Has anyone made a vline-like external that only takes the first two  
values?

Cheers,
~Brandon

On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> Note that the former version is *muchmuch* more convenient,  
>> especially
>> when building line segments dynamically.
>
> totally!
> i just wanted to demonstrate that there is indeed no mandatory  
> reason to
> have the 3rd value - but not because of the shortcuts kyle mentioned
> (which seem to do more harm than good)
>
> fgmadsr.
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to