[smooth] in pixelTANGO does just lop in message domain, written by Thomas Grill. Should just work in pd extended...
.b. Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote: > >> I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in >> equal amounts! >> > yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). > i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration > and therefore are willing to help. > >> Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a >> control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, >> archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using >> [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my >> patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on. > > yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to > go into the audio domain. >> I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as >> it seems to me like quite a useful function. > > definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the > most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to > have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, > which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain. > > roman > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list