I Read about those CGC but not the neural gas. Looks like the new SOM/CGC stuff in FANN is nice, I'll have to look into that as it could make ann_som a very clean implementation.
Any idea if the network saving stuff was fixed? I would need that working for my application. Thanks for the heads up. .b. Jamie Bullock wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:26 -0800, B. Bogart wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I just wanted to get a sense of the ann_som users out there. >> >> I would like to make some changes/additions, in particular: >> >> * Gaussian neighbourhood function to increase convergence with many sensors. >> >> * built in function for randomizing sensors (my network has about 4 >> million weights, which is pretty anoying to use "init" for.) >> >> Maybe more as things move along. > > Nice to see someone working on this. I haven't used [ann_som] in > earnest, but I have used [ann_mlp], which is great, and am generally > interested in the progress of AI things in Pd. > > One thing it might be worth looking at is the SOM and Growing Neural Gas > support that was added to the FANN library as part of GSoC last year. > There is some discussion about it on this thread: > > http://leenissen.dk/fann/forum/viewtopic.php?t=46&start=30 > > The code is also the FANN CVS under the gsoc2007 branch. I did get it to > compile at one point but I haven't really tested. It may be in some way > informative ? > > Anyhow, I look forward to the [ann_som] improvements. > > Jamie > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list