No, I missed LAC, but it is not surprising that people research in that direction. I was looking through some papers yesterday, but not the one from jürgen, will catch up on that. marius.
Andrée Préfontaine wrote: > > Le 08-03-04 à 11:14, marius schebella a écrit : > >> hi, >> I am reading an old interview with james moorer (with curtis roads in >> CMJ/6 1982). one funny thing is that he says, 'software synthesis is >> either dead or dying[...] I am hoping it's demise will be quick and >> relatively painless.' >> in return he predicted all computation being done on special dsp chips. >> in part he was right, but on the other hand the main cpu got more than >> fast enough to survive (gfx is slightly different), but - and I am >> coming to my point - he also was thinking about hundreds or thousands of >> parallel processing elements. right now, we are going to have several >> and in the future many many parallel CPUs, and the need for parallel >> processing is back. miller was talking about that in montreal. >> so I wonder how pd will survive that evolution? afaik the current >> situation is poor in this regard. can anyone give an outview for the >> future? would it be a jump from pd (I) 0.43 to pd II 0.1? >> marius. > > Where you at Lac 2008? because Jürgen Reuter gave a lecture on the topic > with who you are interested. > I do wonder too in this regard and where very interested in his > presentation : exploiting multi-core architectures for fast modular > synthesis > > Andrée >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
