yes, you're right. sorry, I was not thinking of the gui when I posted my reply, but of course that is an important aspect. marius.
Phil Stone wrote: > It is my impression, at least, that on my MacBookPro, the audio engine > is running on one core, while the graphics run on the other. I could be > wrong about this, but I've never noticed a degradation of audio due to > graphics in my setup, and assumed that this was the reason. > > Obviously, this is not really parallel processing in the sense we're > discussing, but every little bit helps. > > > Phil Stone > pkstonemusic.com > > > marius schebella wrote: >> pd is only using one of 2, 4 or 8. is that what your question was? >> marius. >> >> bsoisoi wrote: >> >>> Along with the question posed by Marius, how does PD currently scale >>> on SMP systems with 2, 4, or 8 cores? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Brandon >>> >>> >>> On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, marius schebella wrote: >>> >>> >>>> No, I missed LAC, but it is not surprising that people research in that >>>> direction. I was looking through some papers yesterday, but not the one >>>> from jürgen, will catch up on that. >>>> marius. >>>> >>>> Andrée Préfontaine wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 08-03-04 à 11:14, marius schebella a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> hi, >>>>>> I am reading an old interview with james moorer (with curtis roads in >>>>>> CMJ/6 1982). one funny thing is that he says, 'software synthesis is >>>>>> either dead or dying[...] I am hoping it's demise will be quick and >>>>>> relatively painless.' >>>>>> in return he predicted all computation being done on special dsp >>>>>> chips. >>>>>> in part he was right, but on the other hand the main cpu got more >>>>>> than >>>>>> fast enough to survive (gfx is slightly different), but - and I am >>>>>> coming to my point - he also was thinking about hundreds or >>>>>> thousands of >>>>>> parallel processing elements. right now, we are going to have several >>>>>> and in the future many many parallel CPUs, and the need for parallel >>>>>> processing is back. miller was talking about that in montreal. >>>>>> so I wonder how pd will survive that evolution? afaik the current >>>>>> situation is poor in this regard. can anyone give an outview for the >>>>>> future? would it be a jump from pd (I) 0.43 to pd II 0.1? >>>>>> marius. >>>>>> >>>>> Where you at Lac 2008? because Jürgen Reuter gave a lecture on the >>>>> topic >>>>> with who you are interested. >>>>> I do wonder too in this regard and where very interested in his >>>>> presentation : exploiting multi-core architectures for fast modular >>>>> synthesis >>>>> >>>>> Andrée >>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list