I also find [sssad] easier to understand, but I really like the power of [pool] underneath memento (as well as the OSC integration).
I suppose [pool] could be used with [sssad] as well. I'd be interested in hearing more of your thoughts on the future of state-saving in PD, Frank (and Luke). Phil Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote: > > >> I find that powerful and complex PD systems such as memento/rradical are >> very difficult to understand without a little more documentation. When >> I try to follow what's going on inside of [originator] (both in original >> memento and in semento), I rapidly get lost. >> > > Understandable, because it's ugly. I'm relucant to touch this myself, > fearing I might break things. That's also why I'd rather promote > [sssad]. It's not as powerful (yet) but has a much cleaner design > that's easier to extend and also more flexible in the long run. > I wouldn't recommend to spend a lot of time in [originator]'s > internals. > > Ciao > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list