On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 20:09 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, marius schebella wrote: > > > Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote: > >> > >>> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait! > >> > >> as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is relative to pd, so you > >> have > >> to use: > >> > >> [declare -path oscx] (assuming the folder is <pd-path>/extra/oscx) > >> > >> roman > > > > but that is exaclty what I used! (see 2 lines above...) something is > > broken with declare. (see mails before).
oh.. i really shouldn't have had done this mistake... actually there are even two.. blame myself! test again with: [declare -stdpath extra/oscx] if THIS is not working, then write a bug report. this is at least working with pd-vanilla 0.40.3 three times sorry for the unnecessary confusion. roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list