On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 20:09 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> 
> > Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, marius schebella wrote:
> >>
> >>> declare -path oscx is also doing nothing. oh, wait!
> >>
> >> as written in the declare-help.pd, -path is relative to pd, so you  
> >> have
> >> to use:
> >>
> >> [declare -path oscx] (assuming the folder is <pd-path>/extra/oscx)
> >>
> >> roman
> >
> > but that is exaclty what I used! (see 2 lines above...) something is
> > broken with declare. (see mails before).

oh.. i really shouldn't have had done this mistake... actually there are
even two.. blame myself!

 test again with:

[declare -stdpath extra/oscx]

if THIS is not working, then write a bug report. this is at least
working with pd-vanilla 0.40.3

three times sorry for the unnecessary confusion.

roman



                
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de


_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to