On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 17:17 +0900, hard off wrote: > oops, sorry for double reply spencer..forgot to send this mail to the > list.
no problem. I get the digest, so this sped up the process, anyways! :) > > > the [send~] & [receive~] objects only work for default block size. hmm, the block~ documentation only seems to say that the blocking must be the same if you're send~ing across subpatches, which I assumed meant that sending within a reblocked subpatch would be OK. Is there a technical reason for this limitation? > you can create a table the same size as your new blocksize, and use > [tabsend~] / [tabreceive~], although i think that might bring in a one > block delay, which might not be what you want. I could also use a delwrite~ and a delread~, which shouldn't introduce a delay if I force dsp calculation order using other subpatches. Just a little less clean. thanks! -spencer _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list