On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 17:18 +0100, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > Matt Barber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for this. Out of curiosity, what's the main difference between > > [loadbang] and [initbang] for use in abstractions (does [initbang] not > > send a bang when you open the abstraction file for editing but only > > when you load it in another file)? > > [loadbang] fires after the abstraction is loaded and connected into the > containing patch, so [loadbang]--[outlet] should work. > > [initbang] fires after the abstraction is loaded but before connections > are made in the containing patch, so you can create i/o-lets and have > them still be connected. > > > Also, the [namecanvas] helpfile says it is obsolete -- is it likely to > > disappear? > > It's only "obsolete" because it's possible to crash pd if you use it > incorrectly. I think it'll stay if enough people use it :)
if this would be a sufficient reason for obsoleteness, some other classes would reach 'obsolete' state as well for sure: [until], [makefilename] (probably more). roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list