That was the problem, indeed. Thanks.
2008/7/8 Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hallo, > Ricardo Dueñas Parada hat gesagt: // Ricardo Dueñas Parada wrote: > >> Sometimes the object delay doesn't work correctly, I mean, if I put a 500, >> I expect to have a 500 ms bang delay. And it does, but when it wants. >> Other times it just let the bang pass, as with 0 delay. >> >> Most of the times it happens when I have a delay right after an inlet, >> seriously I don?t know what could be happening. >> >> I correct it by changing the value of the delay, usually to 1000, and it >> works >> correctly, then I rewrite the correct value. > > I'm pretty sure that [delay] in Pd works correctly, unless there are > new bugs, which everyone and their sister would already shout about by > now in an object as important as delay. > > If it works correctly, the only reason for the behaviour you describe > that I can think of is that you are sending a number instead of a bang > to [delay] at certain times. > > Sending a number to the delay on *both* inlets will change the delay > time. The change happens immediatly, if you send the number to the > hot, left inlet, and on the next bang, if you used the cold inlet for > the number. > > You could insert a [bang] object before the [delay] to get rid of the > numbers, but maybe first find out, where the numbers come from. > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list