yo.. very nice! you're definitely making my pd life easier!!
roman On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:24 -0400, Matt Barber wrote: > Not to be a stinker, > > These are very easy to implement as abstractions in Pd vanilla even > without expr~, yes-no? > > > [>~] : > > > [inlet~] [inlet] > | / > [-~ $1] > | > [max~ 0] > | \ > [/~] > | > [outlet~] > > > > [<~] : > > > [inlet~] [inlet] > | / > [-~ $1] > | > [min~ 0] > | \ > [/~] > | > [outlet~] > > > > [==~] : > > > [inlet~] [inlet] > | / > [-~ $1] > | \ > [sig~ 1] [/~ ] > \__ _/ > [-~] > | > [outlet~] > > > or : > > > [inlet~] [inlet] > | / > [-~ $1] > | \ > [/~] > | > [*~ -1] > | > [+~ 1] > | > [outlet~] > > Not that this helps at all with the special character problem, and > they're bound to be less efficient. One cool thing, though, is the > ability to turn both inlets into signal inlets (but ditching the $1). > > Matt > > > > > > Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:18:08 +0900 > > From: "hard off" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [PD] really annoying question about tildes~ > > To: "IOhannes m zmoelnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: pd-list@iem.at > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > yeah totally. > > > > it seems nonsensical that pd has > and < for control signals, but not for > > audiorate signals. > > > > and as andy obiwan mentioned before [pow~] would also be very useful. > > > > > > as far as i can guess, all of these objects are very simple code-wise. > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list