Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:40 AM, marius schebella wrote: > >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> As a test yes, but not for the release. It's changing too fast right >>> now to maintain backwards compatibility, so including it would cause >>> more problems than it would solve. >> >> I am not sure, if it really changes, or if it only adds new features. >> I think the big problems (file naming, loader) are solved, but not sure. >> I worked a lot with py/pyext and pdj in the past (which are also >> candidates for pdx), but pdlua is the only scripting tool that can >> easily integrate the language as a static library, because it is so >> small. maintainance should be easier than with python and java. > > Adding features is also changing.
but it doesnot affect backwards compatibility. it only adds new features. and btw it would give pdx a breeze of brazilian flair. > >>> I just had a thought: how about replacing Tcl/Tk with Lua/Tk? Just a >>> thought... >> >> is this just a matter of replacing one with the other, or does this >> mean every graphical part has to be rewritten? >> >> marius. > > > It would mean rewriting pd.tk in Lua and translating the Tcl/Tk code in > the C files into Lua/Tk. and that would allow opengl calls for the interface! I think the problem with that is, that it is extremely difficult to isolate the interface parts from the pd code? marius. _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list