Enrique Erne wrote: >> just out of curiosity: >~.pd, <~.pd, sgn~ and what else in zexy are >> already pd-vanilla abstractions (some of them are both abstractions >> and externals for performance reasons); is there an advantage in >> collecting these things in yet another arbitrary (as opposed to >> grouped by functionality) library? > > where are any abstractions/externals "grouped by functionality"? > do you mean pdmtl?
i didn't mean any special library; it was rather a comment on the absence of "grouped by functionality" libs. > just to be clear: the files netpd.org/eni/purepd/ are not collected as > library, they are just there since i have no other place to put them and > it could be useful for purepd reasons. i did not want to offend you for pointing to your files. the thing i was asking about was, whether these objects should be added to another arbitrary library in svn (a request for which i paranoidedly sensed), without any benefit. > > the svn purepd patches contain some abstractions that confuse me a bit. > actually i would like to contribute to purepd. (i.e. why is there moses > and clip?) well, it proves hat you don't need an external to use them :-) i guess it is rather didactic, but i don't see any harm in having them there. fgmadsr IOhannes _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list