Your memory is correct. Quick fix: use CTL/Apple + D for duplicate instead of CTL/Apple + C for Copy and CTL/Apple + V for Paste. This pastes objects offset from the original, plus it uses less key commands. I can't verify the buggy Paste behavior you report right now, although I did have a workshop full of n00bs over the weekend and no one using 0.40 mentioned this problem to me...
best! d. Andrew Turley wrote: > I'm running Pd-extended 0.40.3 on an iBook G4 in OS X 10.4.11, and > I've noticed that if I copy an object and then paste it to the same > place, the newly pasted object ends up under the old object. This is > annoying because if I have some objects that are already connected to > other objects and I copy and paste them, I then have to move the > original objects out of the way to get access to the newly pasted > objects. I feel like in the previous version of Pd-extended the newly > pasted objects end up on top of the old objects, so that you could > just paste and them move them out of the way. > > So first, is my memory of the old behavior correct? Second, is this > the behavior people would expect? Third, are people seeing this across > platforms, or is it just me? > > andy -- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ---Oblique Strategy # 189: "You are an engineer" _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list