In a way~, it's not so straightforward. Let's say the random generators are identical and seeded by another identical random generator with no further modifications. Then, all the other random generators are correlated--using the same sequence, but with slightly different starting points within that sequence.
so, you need to have a map of the range of random onto itself, which is different from the random sequence mapping. That way, you actually obtain seed values which are spaced far apart in the sequence. This could be actually pretty simple, e.g. seed=rand_max - input_from_1st_rand Chuck On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:39 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Peach wrote: > >> Or have a single random generator inside pd that feeds all the random >> objects. > > yes of course, this would be the most straight forward solution. > > > mfgasdr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
