Hallo, these are cool, I will definitely include some of them (minus the import, which then isn't needed anymore).
I'm just wondering, if I should just add the second inlet to [list-drip] directly instead of using an extra object [list-dripx]. What do people think? Luke Iannini hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini wrote: > list-proc-insert does decorating: cross connect it with a process to > process incoming lists and then insert the results back into the > original list. For example, append the length of a list onto the > original list (oh no, now it is creating paradoxes). It has uses, I > promise, I just can't remember them right now. One use is to build something like [list-enumerate]. However maybe this one is a bit too simple to make it into a separate abstraction for [list]-abs? It's more or less just: ... | [t a a] | \ [ ? ] \ | \ [list-insert] | ... Or am I oversimplifying? ;) Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list