Ok Roman, now i understand, thanx. ++ Jack
Le 8 oct. 08 à 16:39, Roman Haefeli a écrit : > > i assume, i wasn't very clear. > > X and Y are supposed to be the coefficient and _not_ the incoming > signal. > > attached patch explains probably better, what i meant. > > roman > > > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:16 +0200, Jack wrote: >> Hello all, hello Roman, >> I try your method with X+Y=1 and 0<X<1 and 0<Y<1 >> and your description for the patch. >> So i get this patch. It seems that i get strange result, no ? Or i >> miss something ? >> ++ >> >> Jack >> >> >> >> Le 8 oct. 08 à 15:58, Roman Haefeli a écrit : >> >>> >>> [inlet] >>> | >>> [* X] >>> | >>> [+ ]X[* Y] >>> | >>> [outlet] >>> >>> >>> and make sure, that X + Y = 1 and bothe are < 1 and > 0. >>> >>> roman >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 13:08 +0200, Martin . wrote: >>>> Very simple question: >>>> >>>> what is an object that can low pass filter floats (not ~)? >>>> >>>> is there a searchable database on pd objects? googling only found >>>> this >>>> http://en.flossmanuals.net/PureData/ListofObjects >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Martin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___________________________________________________________ >>> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http:// >>> messenger.yahoo.de >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >>> listinfo/pd-list >> >> <patch.pd> _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list