On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:27:08PM -0400, Bill Gribble wrote: > I have a patch of medium complexity, with a handful of instruments~ and > a bunch of sequencing and arranging-type message handling. On my speedy > Intel laptop it has no problem and barely notches the CPU usage. > However, when I run this patch on my teeny Geode-based UMPC it pegs CPU > at 100%. i wouldn't expect a lot from a geode machine ;)) > > I'm pretty sure this is a denormal issue. There are a grand total of > maybe 5 noise~, 5 osc~, 10 vline~, 5 lop~, and 1 delay line in the whole > patch and not much else besides message processing... I wouldn't guess > this to run me out of compute power. pardon, but what the word 'denormals' means? ..never heard it > > Any hints on how to isolate where the denormals might be popping up? I > have looked for signal processing loops, and the only ones I create are > around the delayline (feedback) and I suppose in the iir implementation > of the lop~. > > Any help appreciated, > Bill Gribble > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list