On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:48:45PM +0100, Damian Stewart wrote: > hey, > > i find myself often repeating a construct like this: > > [t b a] > | | > [1 ( ... > | why don't you just make some handy abstraction ? > > now, the last time i was using Max, i noticed that Max's trigger object > allows you to go > > [t 1 a] > > and the left outlet will send out the number 1. or even: > > [t reset a] > > and the left outlet sends out the message 'reset'. this seems to me like an > extremely handy feature, so if it gets the blessings of the list(s) i'd > like to go and implement it and submit a patch. > > what do folks think of this? i know there was some discussion a year or two > ago, talking about how you should only be using the 'bang' and 'anything' > keywords with trigger and not using it as a type-bashing object. not sure > what came of that though... > > chur > d > -- > damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list