On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Mike McGonagle hat gesagt: // Mike McGonagle wrote: > > > I think this should be allowed, hell, even the use of other $ > > arguments. It would be nice to be able to allow abstractions to create > > their own private data structures, or at least ones that could be > > named based on a creation argument. > > So what I generally do if I use $0-structs is to not save the data > structure instances with "write pd-x" but traverse and parse them down > into [textfile] and use that for storing and reloading. I.e. with
I do the same, but I use sssad to store the serialised data which gives the user flexibility about where they want to save it. Check out the [pd load] and [pd save] subpatches in s-nadsr~ for an example of how to do this with datastructures: <http://mccormick.cx/viewcvs/*checkout*/s-abstractions/s-nadsr~.pd?root=svn> Best, Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list