Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote: > [list-sort] still beats it. I have a feeling that some of the > overhead in [list-shellsort] is in the [list-swap] function and other > list-abs objects, which are a little too feature-rich and/or > idiot-proof for this particular use. =o)
Attached is a variant of [list-idx] called [list-nth] that probably is a lot faster. It doesn't handle negative indices, however. It's based on modifying a message box to get the element by index, which should reduce the memory load with long lists. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__
list-nth-help.pd
Description: application/puredata
list-nth.pd
Description: application/puredata
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
