Hi! Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Peter Plessas hat gesagt: // Peter Plessas wrote: >>> i somehow assumed, that [writesf~] doesn't use scheduled messages... >> I always thought that Pd would execute messages in between audio blocks. >> So if i sent two messages (stop old file, start new file), i expected >> them to happen in a gap between two blocks, hence gapless recorded files >> possible. Franks demonstration shows that i have to explicitly time >> those messages according to a block~ (or equivalent) in order to get >> this behavior. Still all blurry to me, let's look on! > > Acutally I found that my patch also works without explicit block > timing: Just replace the [pd blockbang~] subpatch with [bang] and see > for yourself. However it fails if you try to record less than one > block.
Yes, that seems to work for me too! But, can you test it with stereo [writesf~ 2] files? I get clicks on those ones. thanks for helping out! regards, PP > > Ciao _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list