Joe Newlin wrote: > I think the problem there is that you have $0 in the message object. You
apart from this (which answers the question i guess), i would like to ask, why this can only be illustrated by attaching uncompressed bmp-files. a quick size comparision: bmp (uncompressed): 508050 bytes jpg (compressed): 35535 bytes png (compressed): 15083 bytes pd (uncompressed): 421 bytes the original mail had 2 identical copies of the image, the first reply carried a 3rd copy. so including base64 encoding, these 2 emails ate away more than 2MB. shall i re-introduce a size-limit for posts to the list? sorry for the usual rants :-) fgamrs IOhannes _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list