hi, i can't give any hints here but.. i just wanna thank you guys a lot that you're getting to solve this problem with a lot of dirty hands while mine stays clean. This problem brought us (in the past ;) ) a lot of interruption in exciting netpd-jams.
all the best, moritz On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzie...@yahoo.de> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 09:14 -0500, Martin Peach wrote: > > > > martin, would you mind implementing similar changes to [tcpclient] as > > > well? > > > > > > > > > > I'll do that today if I have time. > > yo... no hurry.. but it seems you already did it. many thanks. > > those changes to [tcpserver] and [tcpclient] enable me to solve a _lot_ > of issues with netpd (which currently is still based on > [netclient]/[netserver]). some of them were very long standing problems, > such as server hangs, and it took me also a long time to understand the > underlying causes for those problems. i am very satisfied to see, that > the current problems can be addressed now. > > i think there is nothing left to be said for now. it's definitely time > to get my hands dirty again on the netpd-server and other related > stuff. > > many thanks for your cooperation. > > roman > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list