Hannes Gräuler wrote:
Hi all,

I'm new to Pd and I'm looking for some hints on implementing a DSP external.
I want to implement an external which is capable of simultaneous calculation
of 2 or more coupled instances of it.

On the signal level, this is not possible, because the construction of the DSP
tree forbids feedback loops.

Another way to achieve simultaneous computation of coupled objects is the
following: The coupled objects exchange their adresses via pointer messages.
Now, when the signal of the first of the coupled objects is about to be
computed it should also calculate all coupled objects and store each result
in a buffer. When the DSP-perform on of the remaining objects is called,
it simply copies the buffer its outlet.

hmm, but you know that you might not have the input signals available at your "other" objects yet.

so the best you could come up with that way can be simulated by a simple singleton oscillator which you distribute via [send~].

i guess this is not what you want.


1. While the above proposal feels like a hack to me, I'd like to ask if there
    is any other (smarter) way to enable simultaneous computations?

i don't fully understand why you actually need simultaneous computations.

the trivial answer is of course to do the simultaneous computation in a single object... and handle "simultaneousity" on the patch-level rather than the object-level.


2. Given my proposal is worth to be tried, how would I get to know the "first
    of the coupled objects"? Is there a way to get the timestamp of the current
    DSP iteration, so that I can determine when to calculate all buffers?

there's a non-public, non-exported function "ugen_getsortno()" which is used for this very purpose in d_delay.c depending on your linker, you might be able to use it anyhow (note that it must be called in the _dsp() callback)

fgamdr
IOhannes

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to