On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 00:23 +0900, hard off wrote: > what about something like sending a value to the inlet of an audio > arithmetic object? would that update the dsptree? > > i'm wondering why the audio in my abstractions is working, because i > don't think i am doing any of those things. > afaik, it's only the newest dynamically created tilde-abstraction, that is _not_ part of the dsp-tree. if you generate 3000 abstractions dynamically, you won't notice the one, that is missing.
i hope, someone with insight into the pd-code can confirm this: i experienced, that turning dsp off _before_ dynamically create abstractions, and turning dsp on again after it, is much faster. i assume (someone please correct me), this is because as long as dsp is off, the dsp tree isn't updated at all, even if tilde objects are created. however, when it is running, it will get updated on the creation of every instance, which makes it so slow. when it's off during the creation and turned only after, the dsp-tree will be only update once. this is why all my dynamic patches do a [t b b b] with the following order: - [; pd dsp 0( - create all the instances dynamically - [; pd dsp 1( roman ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list