On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 13:28 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Roman Haefeli <reduzie...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > From: Roman Haefeli <reduzie...@yahoo.de>
> > Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message
> > To: "Wolfgang Jäger" <wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at>
> > Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> > Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 5:54 PM
> > On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang Jäger wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > What's the best way to convert a signal into a
> > message?
> > > There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~,
> > but they are not
> > > accurate. The error they produce when you convert into
> > a message and
> > > reconvert to a signal (with sig~, line~ or vline~) is
> > clearly audible-
> >
> > yeah, because you most likely capture not _all_ samples and
> > convert them
> > to messages. in order to do so, you would have to use
> > [vsnapshot~] and
> > bang it 44.1 times per milliseconds. [snapshot~]
> > wouldn't work, since it
> > always captures the first (or last?) sample of the block.
>
> Isn't it the last sample of the block? (see attached)
>
> -Jonathan
i guess, you're right. thanks for the patch.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Der fr�he Vogel f�ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
