On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:32 AM, cyrille henry <cyrille.he...@la-kitchen.fr>wrote:
> > source code for both object look really diferent, so i don't know if it is > possible. > but seriously : why do you need to replace vcf~ with bp~??? > > Cyrille I wouldn't say I *need* to, I'd just like to... Here's an example: I was making a composition that used a choral pad with vcf~ objects acting as movable formants. I decided I only really need the voices to sing "aaaaah," so I realized I don't need the movable formants after all, so I can economize on CPU by using static bandpass filters rather than moving ones. I've never seen anything about differences between the filters' internal math, so I was surprised to find that they sound different. So basically what I want to know is: if I have a vcf~ with a given q and constant center frequency, is there a way to replace it more cheaply? --Stefán
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list