It would definitely be possible to write a pdpoly~ but usually it
would be easier to manually manage 2-4 instances. Few people have
more than 4 cores. I see those poly objects as useful for 10+ and
make managing 100s or 1000s possible.
.hc
On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Phil Stone wrote:
Hello all,
I have skimmed Miller's paper from Pd-con about [pd~], and it looks
like it has potential for taking advantage of multiple-core CPUs. I
need to read it in a little more detail to digest it fully, but I'm
wondering (and this is directed mostly at Frank B.): could
[polypoly] and/or [nqpoly] use [pd~] for each voice/replicated-patch
instance?
Phil Stone
www.pkstonemusic.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. -
David Zicarelli
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
