Hey Thanks! I did enjoy that-not so much the music, but those are the kind of 
controllers I mean-why aren't they popular, or even available? I think being 
able to be as physical as possible in producing music would be such a 
liberating experience-to feel like you're physically sculpting the music. 
Tristan Shone's on the right track if you ask me.

Even some kind of hand held rubiks cube type thing with a bit or resistance, 
with bits you have to turn and buttons you have to push hard on, etc, would be 
fun-no need to resemble existing instruments at all.

And Andy Farnell, thanks and I can understand how a multimedia display that 
'demonstrates authenticity' does justify a live event, though in terms of 
comparing it to guitar or keys, I don't know if I enjoy going to see a live 
concert to see someone prove can play something. I go to see them produce music 
I like-see being the main word. I understand that it's just a different 
world-all I'm saying is that in my opinion physicality matters a great deal in 
performance and I wish more computer artists would take it seriously. 

I think even those who appreciate the multimedia display component would enjoy 
seeing the performer more physically active, and valid though the multimedia 
display may be, I don't think it compensates for what I get from seeing the 
physical actions and hearing the resulting sound-I think they're two very 
differnet components of a performance. In any case, I can't see a reason why 
the two have to be mutually exclusive.
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:42:51 +0000
From: dwanaf...@yahoo.fr
To: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: [PD] Re : "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the    
BBC



Hi Babsyco

You'll probably enjoy this guy's work : 
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/09/tristan_shones_sound_machines.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890

De : babsyco babsyco <babs...@hotmail.com>
À : pd-list@iem.at
Envoyé le : Mercredi, 9 Septembre 2009, 16h43mn 49s
Objet : Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC





Hey guys,

I just wanna say that in terms of live computer music, to me lack of physical 
interaction makes it totally boring for me. When I've mentioned this to some 
artists who's 'live performance' consists of them staring at a computer screen 
hitting buttons-maybe there'll be some arbitrary visual display if I'm lucky-I 
could tell they were thinking 'Philistine! go see a Pink concert if you want to 
see someone compensating for a complete lack of musical talent, artistry or 
substance with a dazzling live performance complete with the obligatory 
crowd-clapping breakdown-I'm solely and purely about the MUSIC being created, 
and if you were too, the sound would be enough for you'.

But I reckon this attitude is, if I may be so bold, BULLSHIT. If that's your 
attitude fine, but in that case what's the point of a live performance at all 
(needless to say I'm not talking about installations or spatialised pieces)? 
When I go see a live performance, I
 wanna see someone creating the music, and to me, that means physically 
creating it in some way. I wanna see that their emotions or concentration or 
whatever is being used in their act of creation is so intense that I can see 
physical manifestations of it through their physical actions. I think the area 
of MIDIcontroller technology is so ignored, probably cause there's no market fo 
it cause of that dumb attitude. I wish someone would come up with some 
interesting physical controller that actually requires substantial physical 
effort to manipulate parameters, or at least could withstand and respond to it. 

At the end of the day I don't think a live performance IS about the music, no 
matter how good-it's about seeing someone pour themselves into creating music 
you like, seeing their effort and passion in every action they perform, and 
most importantly hearing those actions effect on the sound being produced. If I 
were King, I'd be taking advantage
 of computer musical capabilities to make physical instruments/controllers that 
take MORE physical actions than any actual acoustic/electric instrument could 
require-MUCH more. I dream of having a set-up where I have to run around, 
smashing stuff with hammers, pushing giant sliders with all my strength, 
etc-now THAT would be a live performance I'd enjoy.

Let's get physical, and stop kidding ourselves-it matters ( . . . for live 
performance).

Babsyco.
 
> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:24:55 -0400
> From: js0...@gmail.com
> To: fga...@gmail.com
> CC: pd-list@iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the   
> BBC
> 
> hola
> 
> thx for your thoughtful post.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Fernando Gadea <fga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1- physical instruments
> 
> well, yes; body, rhythm, instruments,
 music.
> 
> but i think there is also something interesting in 'mental' music. or
> music that is achieved only through programming sounds. like those old
> vienese [and of course other places too] used to do with paper and pen
> ...
> 
> 
> > 2- About academic-high culture-Art and popular-low culture-art
> 
> this is a religious war- completely outside the bounds of rationality.
> and really, i don't care which 'club' an artist comes fro i just
> want their work to captivate me.
> 
> what makes something art? how do we know if it is any good?
> there are no laws about this. people assert them periodically, but
> they are soon enough forgotten.
> 
> -- 
> \js  [  - . .  .   ]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Check out The Great Australian Pay Check Take a peek at other people's pay and 
perks

_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your iPhone Find out how here
http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=845706
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to