Hi Ben, For what it's worth, I just tested a patch running steady at 85% with 0.41.4-extended, and realtime reliably gives me values between 992-1008ms for a [delay 1000]. This is on a 2.5Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB, OS 10.5.8.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM, B. Bogart <b...@ekran.org> wrote: > Hey all, > > I've been running a patch on an intel mac for a while, but noticed some > horrid timing problems [delay 1000] takes ~3000ms according to [realtime]. > The patch uses between 50% and 105% CPU according to top. > > I've not got it down to about ~1500ms, but I can't pull back the patch any > further, and top says it using only 50-64% CPU... > > I realized I was not using -rt, but when I try and run pd-extended (sorry I > don't recall the version, probably the stable one as of Sept 2009) pd does > not start in -rt mode, I get no messages from stdout or the console like I > do in linux to tell me about priority scheduling. > > Are there versions of pd-extended for OSX where -rt works? How do I set it. > > I tried: > > -rt in "startup flags" > > sudo /Application/Pd-extended/.../bin/pd -rt > > sudo su > /Application/Pd-extended/.../bin/pd -rt > > And nothing works. > > So what have I missed? Or what Pd should I be using? > > Thanks, > B. Bogart > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- William Brent www.williambrent.com “Great minds flock together” Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century www.conflations.com _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list