On 2010-03-08 09:40, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > Great. > Just out of curiosity however, what do the warning mean? Well ok, they > mean a class has been overridden, but "why"? The classes mentioned in > the error messages (pix_videoDS for example) don't exist in Pd, so it > seems like they are defined twice in Gem?
yes. > > I just would like to understand roughly what's going on... > so basically, if two objectclasses claim the same name, older versions of Pd would just ignore the second attempt to register a class with that name, whereas newer versions will happily give the name to the newer objectclass (but issuing a warning). in Gem some names are used multiple times, because of either inheritance (one objectlcass being derived from other another objectclass; this is C++-talk....) or for compatibility reasons (e.g. using deprecated names). it currently does work despite of the warnings, but i would like to get rid of such disturbing matters in the next release. fgmsadr IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
