IOhannes m zmoelnig escribió:
there are two possibilities why this is happening:
- there is a bug in Gem that doesn't mark the images as "old" (was this
on w32 or osx?)
W32 (Windows Vista)
- there is a "bug" in the image acquisition backend (DirectShow,
QuickTime,...) that just serves the same image twice as if it were new.
What test may I do to tell which one of the two is true?
By the way, if the image were correctly marked as "old", would
[pix_movement] use this information (i.e. avoid comparing tro frames
that are actually the same frame)? Or do you have to handle this
explicitly with pix_info?
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistise...@gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
